Shaw v. Hunt

516 U.S. 962, 116 S. Ct. 415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. Hunt. Read the opinion of the Court — 515 U.S. 1172
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 6, 1995·No. No. 94-923; No. 94-924·Published

Opinion

D. C. E. D. N. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 515 U. S. 1172.] Motion of appellants James Arthur Pope et al. for divided argument granted. Motion of appellees for divided argument granted.. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for additional time for oral argument granted. The time is divided as follows: appellants Ruth Shaw et ah, 30 minutes; appellants James Arthur Pope et al., 10 minutes; appellees James B. Hunt, Jr., et al., 20 minutes; appellees Ralph Gingles et al., 10 minutes; the Solicitor General, 10 minutes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. Hunt, 516 U.S. 962, 116 S. Ct. 415 (1995).

516 U.S. 962 (Shaw v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.