Shaw v. Hunt

Fourth Circuit

Shaw v. Hunt

274 F. App'x 263

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2008·No. No. 07-7567·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Shaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Hunt, No. 5:98-ct-000691-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Shaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Hunt, No. 5:98-ct-000691-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shaw v. Hunt, 274 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

274 F. App'x 263 (Shaw v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related