Shaw v. Hamilton

10 Ind. 182
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 1858·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action by Hamilton against ■Shaw and others, to recover certain real estate. There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

[183] During the progress of the cause, and before the trial commenced, a motion was made for a change of venue, founded upon the affidavit of Shaw, alleging that the plaintiff had an undue influence over the citizens of said county, and that an odium attached to said defendant, on account of local prejudice, &c. The motion was overruled.

The venue should have been changed. 7 Ind. R. 110. The affidavit was sufficient. 2 R. S. p. 74.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded with instructions to set aside the judgment, grant a new trial, and a change of venue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. Hamilton, 10 Ind. 182 (Ind. 1858).

10 Ind. 182 (Shaw v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Poston v. District Court
269 P. 35 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1928)
Blackwell v. State
79 So. 731 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Peterson v. St. Clair Circuit Judge
106 N.W. 394 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)
Preston National Bank v. Wayne Circuit Judge
105 N.W. 757 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
Cox v. United States
50 P. 175 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1897)
McClelland v. Bristow
35 N.E. 197 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Burkett v. Holman
3 N.E. 406 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Heshion v. Pressley
80 Ind. 490 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)