Shaw v. Goodman

69 S.E. 173, 135 Ga. 230, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 496
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 12, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 173 (Shaw v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Goodman, 69 S.E. 173, 135 Ga. 230, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 496 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. The judge of the superior court appointed a receiver for the assets of a firm, and gave certain directions to him. Thereafter two creditors brought suit against the members of the firm, and other creditors brought suit against the firm. The receiver of the firm filed his equitable petition, praying that these creditors, and also the judge of the city court in which the suits were pending, be enjoined from proceeding therewith in any manner until after the final judgment in the case in which he was appointed as receiver. Upon presentation of this petition to the judge of the superior court, he granted an order that the creditors named and the judge of the city court should be “temporarily restrained and enjoined from further proceeding with said cases until the final disposition of the receiver’s bill in the case of [naming the main case] pending in the superior court of Berrien county.” No rule nisi was granted, or hearing had, nor was any provision made for a hearing of the application for injunction. Held, that this was not a mere setting of the case for a - hearing, with a temporary restraining order ad interim, but was the grant of an injunction without a hearing, to continue until another ease should terminate, and was erroneous.

(a) It was also error to enjoin the judge of the city court along with the parties to the eases pending therein.

2. The motion to dismiss the writ of error was without merit.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Selman
136 S.E.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Stark v. Waters
106 S.E.2d 401 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Fitzpatrick v. Bloodworth
53 S.E.2d 917 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Grizzel v. Grizzel
3 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Board of Commissioners v. Municipal Securities Corp.
131 S.E. 495 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 173, 135 Ga. 230, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-goodman-ga-1910.