Shaw v. Eggie
This text of 1 N.J. Misc. 133 (Shaw v. Eggie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On tlie preliminary call of the list at the opening of the term, counsel for the respective parties advised the court that the case would be submitted, by agreement, on printed briefs. Notwithstanding this agreement, however, counsel for the defendants has failed to submit to the court any brief for his clients, either within the time limited by our standing rule or at any subsequent date. Such failure raises a presumption that the defendants have abandoned the further prosecution of the rule to show cause, and, this being so, that rule will be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.J. Misc. 133, 1923 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-eggie-nj-1923.