Shaw v. Dwight

17 Abb. Pr. 18, 26 How. Pr. 163
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1863
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Abb. Pr. 18 (Shaw v. Dwight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Dwight, 17 Abb. Pr. 18, 26 How. Pr. 163 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).

Opinion

Sutherland, P. J.

The question of costs presented by the appeal was recently carefully examined by Judge Bosworth, of the Superior Court, in G-lentworth a. Mount, and he came to the conclusion, that since the amendment, in 1858, of section 307 of the Code, there has been and is no limitation to the number of term-fees in the Court of Appeals, taxable under subdivision 7 of that section. A copy of his opinion

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Perkins
25 How. Pr. 368 (New York Supreme Court, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Abb. Pr. 18, 26 How. Pr. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-dwight-nysupct-1863.