Shaw v. Douglas A. Churdar, PC

Fourth Circuit

Shaw v. Douglas A. Churdar, PC

386 F. App'x 415

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. No. 09-2119·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oscar L. Shaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shaw v. Churdar, No. 6:09-cv-02149-HFF, 2009 WL 2778255 (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oscar L. Shaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shaw v. Churdar, No. 6:09-cv-02149-HFF, 2009 WL 2778255 (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shaw v. Douglas A. Churdar, PC, 386 F. App'x 415 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

386 F. App'x 415 (Shaw v. Douglas A. Churdar, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related