Shaw v. Dart

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

COREY JOSEPH A. SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:24-CV-026-GSL-APR

ERIN STOKES, JACOB OTTO,

Defendants.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich’s report and recommendation entered on July 22, 2025. [DE 81]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Rodovich recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion, found at [DE 73]. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Rodovich’s report and recommendation, [DE 81], in full and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion, [DE 73]. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: August 7, 2025

/s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court