Shaw v. City of New York

253 A.D. 924, 2 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9286
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an alleged nuisance caused by the alleged negligence of defendants, which nuisance consisted of the encroachment [925]*925on the public highway of a cement coping upon which a low iron picket fence was imposed, and by the adult plaintiff to recover damages for loss of the infant’s services, judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Bland v. Kaufman, 249 App. Div. 842.) In our opinion the doctrine of the case cited has not been overruled by the determination of the Court of Appeals in the subsequent case of Halpin v. New York Railways Corp. (250 App. Div. 613; affd. without opinion, 276 N. Y. 545). The ruling in the Halpin case, considered in the light of its peculiar facts, is not at variance with our ruling in the Bland case and herein. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. City of New York, 253 A.D. 924, 2 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

253 A.D. 924 (Shaw v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaplan v. City of New York
269 A.D. 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Hayton v. McLaughlin
43 N.E.2d 813 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Hayton v. McLaughlin
263 A.D. 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)