Shaw v. Byars

Fourth Circuit

Shaw v. Byars

548 F. App'x 909

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2013·No. No. 13-7404·Published

Opinion

[910] Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

LeRoy Shaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Byars, No. 9:12-cv-00520-RBH, 2013 WL 4500448 (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[910] Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

LeRoy Shaw appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Byars, No. 9:12-cv-00520-RBH, 2013 WL 4500448 (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shaw v. Byars, 548 F. App'x 909 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

548 F. App'x 909 (Shaw v. Byars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related