Shaw v. Betts
4 A. 731, 2 Sadler 452, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 693
Opinion
If the learned judge committed any error in this case, it was in being too favorable to the plaintiff in error. There is certainly nothing giving him any just cause of complaint. When a sum of money is decreed to two persons jointly, and one of them claims more than a moiety thereof, he takes on himself the burden of proving, in some manner, his right thereto.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shaw v. Betts, 4 A. 731, 2 Sadler 452, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 693 (Pa. 1886).
4 A. 731 (Shaw v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fitch Estate
4 Pa. D. & C.3d 505 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1978)