Shaw v. Barr
506 U.S. 1019, 121 L. Ed. 2d 580
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 7, 1992·No. No. 92-357·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. C. Probable jurisdiction noted. Argument shall be limited to the following question which all parties are directed to brief: “Whether a state legislature’s intent to comply with the Voting Rights Act and the Attorney General’s interpretation thereof precludes a finding that the legislature’s congressional redistricting plan was adopted with in[1020] vidious discriminatory intent where the legislature did not accede to the plan suggested by the Attorney General but instead developed its own.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shaw v. Barr, 506 U.S. 1019, 121 L. Ed. 2d 580 (1992).
506 U.S. 1019 (Shaw v. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Johnson
160 B.R. 800 (S.D. Ohio, 1993)
Zablonski v. Sears Mortgage Corp. (In Re Zablonski)
153 B.R. 604 (D. Massachusetts, 1993)
In Re Saglio
153 B.R. 4 (D. Rhode Island, 1993)
In Re Terranova
152 B.R. 20 (D. Connecticut, 1993)
In re Christie
159 B.R. 780 (E.D. Texas, 1993)
In Re Jones
152 B.R. 155 (E.D. Michigan, 1993)
In re Thompson
159 B.R. 127 (D. New York, 1993)
Richards v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. (Richards)
151 B.R. 8 (D. Massachusetts, 1993)