Shaw v. Barr

Supreme Court

Shaw v. Barr

506 U.S. 1019, 121 L. Ed. 2d 580

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 7, 1992

DocketNo. 92-357

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 506 U.S. 1019 (Shaw v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. Barr, 506 U.S. 1019, 121 L. Ed. 2d 580 (1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. C. Probable jurisdiction noted. Argument shall be limited to the following question which all parties are directed to brief: “Whether a state legislature’s intent to comply with the Voting Rights Act and the Attorney General’s interpretation thereof precludes a finding that the legislature’s congressional redistricting plan was adopted with in[1020]*1020vidious discriminatory intent where the legislature did not accede to the plan suggested by the Attorney General but instead developed its own.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. C. Probable jurisdiction noted. Argument shall be limited to the following question which all parties are directed to brief: “Whether a state legislature’s intent to comply with the Voting Rights Act and the Attorney General’s interpretation thereof precludes a finding that the legislature’s congressional redistricting plan was adopted with in[1020]*1020vidious discriminatory intent where the legislature did not accede to the plan suggested by the Attorney General but instead developed its own.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 U.S. 1019, 121 L. Ed. 2d 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-barr-scotus-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack