Shaw v. Atlantic Amusement Co.

228 A.D. 850
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 228 A.D. 850 (Shaw v. Atlantic Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Atlantic Amusement Co., 228 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Young and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial, being of opinion that an issue of fact was presented as to the negligence of the attendant, defendant’s employee. Plaintiff did not ask for assistance. The attendant voluntarily went into the revolving barrel, took hold of plaintiff and pulled her back. They fell and rolled around the barrel, the attendant falling upon her and breaking her arm. Plaintiff’s friend called out to stop the barrel, but this was not done. Under these circumstances the case should have been submitted to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mott v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.
3 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Kreiss v. Luna Park Amusement Corp.
239 A.D. 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-atlantic-amusement-co-nyappdiv-1930.