Shaw v. Associated Grocers of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shaw v. Associated Grocers of Florida

945 So. 2d 572, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20570, 2006 WL 3524388

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 2006·No. No. 1D05-3172·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed as being improperly brought from a nonfinal order which granted a motion to dismiss, but which did not actually dismiss the action in the lower tribunal. See Mintz v. Broward Correctional Institute, 800 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Furthermore, it appears that in the procedural context below a dismissal in the lower tribunal would be without prejudice.

ERVIN, ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed as being improperly brought from a nonfinal order which granted a motion to dismiss, but which did not actually dismiss the action in the lower tribunal. See Mintz v. Broward Correctional Institute, 800 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Furthermore, it appears that in the procedural context below a dismissal in the lower tribunal would be without prejudice.

ERVIN, ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Shaw v. Associated Grocers of Florida, 945 So. 2d 572, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20570, 2006 WL 3524388 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

945 So. 2d 572 (Shaw v. Associated Grocers of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.