Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership

516 F. App'x 269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2013
DocketNo. 12-2344
StatusPublished

This text of 516 F. App'x 269 (Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership, 516 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerel Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP, 903 F.Supp.2d 413 (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership
903 F. Supp. 2d 413 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-aramark-management-services-ltd-partnership-ca4-2013.