Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership

516 F. App'x 269
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2013·No. No. 12-2344·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerel Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP, 903 F.Supp.2d 413 (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership, 516 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2013).

516 F. App'x 269 (Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. Partnership
903 F. Supp. 2d 413 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)