Shaw & Markstein v. English
This text of 252 A.D.2d 451 (Shaw & Markstein v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered December 6, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion to confirm a Special Referee’s report recommending a finding that defendant owed plaintiff attorney nothing inasmuch as plaintiff’s client was a certain corporation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The Referee in his report did not exceed the bounds of the court’s order of reference, and the court properly concluded that the Referee’s findings were supported by the record and, as such, merited confirmation (see, Namer v 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705).
We have considered plaintiff’s additional claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D.2d 451, 675 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-markstein-v-english-nyappdiv-1998.