Shaw Lumber Co. v. RJG Construction Co.

513 N.W.2d 240, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 172, 1994 WL 72525
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 4, 1994
DocketNo. C3-92-2248
StatusPublished

This text of 513 N.W.2d 240 (Shaw Lumber Co. v. RJG Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw Lumber Co. v. RJG Construction Co., 513 N.W.2d 240, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 172, 1994 WL 72525 (Mich. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order-opinion of the court of appeals filed on May 26, 1993 be, and the same is, reversed and the judgment entered in the Ramsey County District Court in favor of petitioner Shaw Lumber Company in the total amount of $33,636.31 and in favor of petitioner Gen-Erik Heating & Cooling, Inc. in the total amount of $6,038.33 be, and the same is, reinstated. It is the view of this court that the trial court was fully aware of the nature and scope of the parties’ stipulation, entered in open court, and of the effect of the final judgment entered pursuant to that stipulation, and under the recorded circumstances, the stipulation and the judgment entered in the trial court cannot be viewed as ambiguous. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s findings that the defendant James M. Boo, Jr. breached the stipulation and violated the court order in which the stipulation was memorialized on the basis that those findings are amply supported by the record.

Reversed and judgment reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
513 N.W.2d 240, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 172, 1994 WL 72525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-lumber-co-v-rjg-construction-co-minn-1994.