Shaw-Henderson, Inc. v. Schneider

Sixth Circuit

Shaw-Henderson, Inc. v. Schneider

453 F.2d 748, 3 ERC 1647

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1971

DocketNo. 71-1475

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 453 F.2d 748 (Shaw-Henderson, Inc. v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw-Henderson, Inc. v. Schneider, 453 F.2d 748, 3 ERC 1647 (6th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s order dismissing the appellant’s complaint for damages and for injunc-tive relief.

The appellant was one of several bidders on a contract let by the City of Charlevoix, Michigan, for the construction of a waste-water treatment plant. The planning and construction was to be in part financed by a. Federal Grant under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1151 et seq. The ap-pellee Schneider was Construction Grants Program Director for the Regional Water Quality Office of the Environmental Protection Agency which made the grant. The appellant sued to enjoin the construction of the plant in question and to obtain damages on the theory that under the provisions of the Act the successful bidder was not in fact the low bidder. All of the issues presented have been adequately considered and resolved in the comprehensive opinion of District Judge Albert J. Engel. 335 F.Supp. 1203.

For the reasons stated by Judge En-gel the decision of the District Court is affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s order dismissing the appellant’s complaint for damages and for injunc-tive relief.

The appellant was one of several bidders on a contract let by the City of Charlevoix, Michigan, for the construction of a waste-water treatment plant. The planning and construction was to be in part financed by a. Federal Grant under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1151 et seq. The ap-pellee Schneider was Construction Grants Program Director for the Regional Water Quality Office of the Environmental Protection Agency which made the grant. The appellant sued to enjoin the construction of the plant in question and to obtain damages on the theory that under the provisions of the Act the successful bidder was not in fact the low bidder. All of the issues presented have been adequately considered and resolved in the comprehensive opinion of District Judge Albert J. Engel. 335 F.Supp. 1203.

For the reasons stated by Judge En-gel the decision of the District Court is affirmed..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 F.2d 748, 3 ERC 1647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-henderson-inc-v-schneider-ca6-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack