Shaw A/C & Elec., LLC v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.

259 So. 3d 330
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 14, 2018·No. NO. 2018-CC-1101·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Granted. The district court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to exclude defendant's untimely opposition and in continuing the hearing on the motion for partial summary judgment. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 966(B)(2) ; Newsome v. Homer Memorial Medical Center , 10-0564 (La. 4/9/10), 32 So.3d 800 ; Buggage v. Volks Constructors , 06-0175 (La. 5/5/06), 928 So.2d 536.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court denying plaintiff's motion to exclude the opposition is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court which is directed to conduct a hearing on the motion for partial summary judgment without consideration of the untimely opposition.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny.

WEIMER, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw A/C & Elec., LLC v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co., 259 So. 3d 330 (La. 2018).

259 So. 3d 330 (Shaw A/C & Elec., LLC v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newsome v. Homer Memorial Medical Center
32 So. 3d 800 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)
Buggage v. Volks Constructors
928 So. 2d 536 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2006)