Shaver v. McLendon

26 Ga. 228
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 26 Ga. 228 (Shaver v. McLendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaver v. McLendon, 26 Ga. 228 (Ga. 1858).

Opinions

By the Court.

Benning J.

delivering the opinion.

It is admitted on all hands, that the plaintiff might recover on this bond and his offered proof, in equity. But what is there to prevent him from doing so in like manner at law.

I think, there is nothing. “Whenever” “a plaintiff or complainant shall conceive, that he she or they, can establish his her or their claim, without resorting to the conscience of the defendant, it shall and may be lawful for every such plaintiff or complainant, to institute his her or their action upon the common law side of the Court, and shall not be held to proceed with the forms of equity; any law or usage to the contrary notwithstanding.” Cobb Dig. 464.

This, as it seems to me, is an authority to the plaintiff to proceed at law in this case. I therefore, think that the Court erred in not admitting the evidence, to the mistake.

Judgment reversed.

Lumpkin J. concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Browning
32 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
McConnell v. Hulsey
87 S.E. 156 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Gaulding v. Baker
71 S.E. 1018 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Parramore v. Alexander
64 S.E. 660 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Richardson v. Allen
74 Ga. 719 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)
Thompson v. Hall & Long
67 Ga. 627 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ga. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaver-v-mclendon-ga-1858.