Shaver v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
This text of 225 F. App'x 617 (Shaver v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Shaver (“Shaver”), a commodities futures broker, appeals from a final order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). 7 U.S.C. §§ 9, 21(i)(4) (2000). The CFTC summarily affirmed and adopted a decision by the National Futures Association (“NFA”), which stated that Shaver engaged in fraudulent customer communications in violation of NFA Compliance Rules 2-2(a) and 2-29(a)(1).
The NFA’s decision that Shaver engaged in fraudulent customer communica[618]*618tions in violation of Compliance Rules 2-2(a) and 2-29(a)(l) is supported by the weight of the evidence. Morris v. CFTC, 980 F.2d 1289,1292 (9th Cir.1992).
Similarly, the NFA’s decision to sanction Shaver with a $2,000 fíne and a 2-year tape recording requirement was not an abuse of discretion. Premex, Inc. v. CFTC, 785 F.2d 1403, 1408 (9th Cir.1986).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 F. App'x 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaver-v-commodity-futures-trading-commission-ca9-2007.