Shaver v. Captain Z

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana
DecidedJuly 24, 2024
Docket3:24-cv-00336
StatusUnknown

This text of Shaver v. Captain Z (Shaver v. Captain Z) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaver v. Captain Z, (N.D. Ind. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

TREVION SHAVER,

Plaintiff,

v. CAUSE NO.: 3:24-CV-336-TLS-APR

CAPTAIN Z, STOCKBRIDGE, and WENDY VANARSDALE,

Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER Trevion Shaver, a prisoner without a lawyer, was ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as abandoned because mail sent to his last known address was returned undeliverable. ECF No. 6. The Court acknowledged if he was not at the address on the docket, that order was unlikely to reach him. However, it was possible he would attempt to determine the status of this case by visiting the clerk’s office (if he had been released from custody) or by checking the online docket, in which case this order would alert him that he needed to take action before the harsh sanction of dismissal was imposed. In addition, if the order was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable, that would serve as further confirmation he did not provide his current address. Thus, the Court believed the show cause order was appropriate notwithstanding the likelihood that it would not reach him. As it turned out, it did not reach him and was returned undeliverable. ECF No. 7. “The demand that plaintiffs provide contact information is no esoteric rule of civil procedure, but rather the obvious minimal requirement for pursuing a lawsuit.” Tylicki v. Ryan, 244 F.R.D. 146, 147 (N.D. N.Y. 2006) (citation omitted). “[L]itigants, including prisoners, bear the burden of filing notice of a change of address.” Snyder v. Nolen, 380 F.3d 279, 285 (7th Cir. 2004) (quotation mark omitted). For these reasons, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). SO ORDERED on July 24, 2024.

s/ Theresa L. Springmann JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James R. Snyder v. Jack T. Nolen
380 F.3d 279 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
Tylicki v. Ryan
244 F.R.D. 146 (N.D. New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shaver v. Captain Z, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaver-v-captain-z-innd-2024.