Shaun Matthew Hedge v. State
This text of Shaun Matthew Hedge v. State (Shaun Matthew Hedge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-07-00879-CR
Shaun Matthew HEDGE, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas Trial Court No. 4673 Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009
AFFIRMED
Shaun Matthew Hedge filed this appeal to challenge his conviction of fraudulent use of
identifying information. On November 14, 2008, we abated the appeal and ordered the trial court
to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant still desired to prosecute his appeal and whether
his counsel had abandoned the appeal. On December 31, 2008, this court adopted the trial court’s
findings that: (1) appellant absconded, indicating a desire not to prosecute his appeal; and (2)
appellant’s absconding precluded counsel from being able to prepare and file a brief. We further 04-07-00879-CR
ordered the appeal to be submitted without briefs. In the interest of justice, we have reviewed the
entire record but have found no unassigned fundamental error. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687,
688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. See id.
Marialyn Barnard, Justice Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shaun Matthew Hedge v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaun-matthew-hedge-v-state-texapp-2009.