Shaul v. Citizens State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Shaul v. Citizens State Bank

61 N.E. 559, 157 Ind. 281, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 158

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 11, 1901

DocketNo. 19,641

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 N.E. 559 (Shaul v. Citizens State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaul v. Citizens State Bank, 61 N.E. 559, 157 Ind. 281, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 158 (Ind. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Monks, C. J.

Appellee brought this action on a promissory note for $100 with interest, and recovered judgment against appellants for $131.75. Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same is a civil action within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, and is, therefore, not appealable.

Section 6 of the act of 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 566), being §1337f Burns 1901, provides that no civil case within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace can be appealed to the Supreme Court or Appellate Court, except as provided in §8 of said act. Said §8, being §1337h Burns 1901, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court in cases unappealable under said §6 (1337f), supra, only when “there is a question, and such question is duly presented, either the validity of a franchise, or the validity of an ordinance of a municipal corporation or the constitutionality of a statute, State or federal, or the proper construction of a statute, or rights guaranteed by the State or federal Constitution.”

Section 1500 Bums 1901, §1433 E. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, provides that “Justices of the peace shall have [282]*282jurisdiction to try and determine suits‘ founded on contracts or tort, where the debt or damage claimed or the value of the property sought to be recovered does not exceed $100, and concurrent jurisdiction to the amount of $200.”

This action, being on a promissory note for not more than $200, was clearly within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace. The fact that the amount of the principal and interest of said not© was more than $100 is immaterial, for the reason that a justice of the peace, under §1500 (1433), supra, has jurisdiction in actions like this to the amount of $200.

As no question mentioned in §8, §1337h, supra, is presented, this action is not appealable. The motion to dismiss the appeal is, therefore, sustained. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monks, C. J.

Appellee brought this action on a promissory note for $100 with interest, and recovered judgment against appellants for $131.75. Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same is a civil action within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, and is, therefore, not appealable.

Section 6 of the act of 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 566), being §1337f Burns 1901, provides that no civil case within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace can be appealed to the Supreme Court or Appellate Court, except as provided in §8 of said act. Said §8, being §1337h Burns 1901, provides for an appeal to the Supreme Court in cases unappealable under said §6 (1337f), supra, only when “there is a question, and such question is duly presented, either the validity of a franchise, or the validity of an ordinance of a municipal corporation or the constitutionality of a statute, State or federal, or the proper construction of a statute, or rights guaranteed by the State or federal Constitution.”

Section 1500 Bums 1901, §1433 E. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, provides that “Justices of the peace shall have [282]*282jurisdiction to try and determine suits‘ founded on contracts or tort, where the debt or damage claimed or the value of the property sought to be recovered does not exceed $100, and concurrent jurisdiction to the amount of $200.”

This action, being on a promissory note for not more than $200, was clearly within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace. The fact that the amount of the principal and interest of said not© was more than $100 is immaterial, for the reason that a justice of the peace, under §1500 (1433), supra, has jurisdiction in actions like this to the amount of $200.

As no question mentioned in §8, §1337h, supra, is presented, this action is not appealable. The motion to dismiss the appeal is, therefore, sustained. Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 N.E. 559, 157 Ind. 281, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaul-v-citizens-state-bank-ind-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack