Shaul Harosh v. T. Gerald Treece, Independent of the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Darla Lexington
This text of Shaul Harosh v. T. Gerald Treece, Independent of the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Darla Lexington (Shaul Harosh v. T. Gerald Treece, Independent of the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Darla Lexington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 16, 2017
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00064-CV ——————————— SHAUL HAROSH, Appellant V. T. GERALD TREECE, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN M. O’QUINN, DECEASED, AND DARLA LEXINGTON, Appellees
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 392,247-412
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed a “Motion for Voluntary Dismissal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Further, although appellant failed to include a certificate of conference in his motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of service,
more than 10 days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has
responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shaul Harosh v. T. Gerald Treece, Independent of the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, and Darla Lexington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaul-harosh-v-t-gerald-treece-independent-of-the-estate-of-john-m-texapp-2017.