Shattuck v. State
This text of 254 A.D. 926 (Shattuck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment we place reliance upon the finding, which is supported by the evidence, that this claimant is so mentally deficient that he was unable to care for himself. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment awards the claimant damages for personal injuries sustained while escaping from an institution for mental defectives.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ. [166 Mise. 271.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shattuck-v-state-nyappdiv-1938.