Shattuck v. Marcus
66 N.E. 196, 182 Mass. 572, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 916
Opinion
If the declarations in these cases are to be construed, as the defendants contend, as each containing only one count, which embraces two causes of action, and so are in violation of the Pub. Sts. c. 167, § 2, cl. 4, the-objection should have been taken by demurrer. Clay v. Brigham, 8 Gray, 161. Downs v. Hawley, 112 Mass. 237, 241.
The exceptions are frivolous, and are overruled with double costs, and interest at twelve per cent.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shattuck v. Marcus, 66 N.E. 196, 182 Mass. 572, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 916 (Mass. 1903).
66 N.E. 196 (Shattuck v. Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abbott Rental Co. v. Poster
312 N.E.2d 589 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)
George N. Pierce Co. v. Beers
76 N.E. 603 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)