Shattuck v. Marcus

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Shattuck v. Marcus

66 N.E. 196, 182 Mass. 572, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 916

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 N.E. 196 (Shattuck v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shattuck v. Marcus, 66 N.E. 196, 182 Mass. 572, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 916 (Mass. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Lathrop, J.

If the declarations in these cases are to be construed, as the defendants contend, as each containing only one count, which embraces two causes of action, and so are in violation of the Pub. Sts. c. 167, § 2, cl. 4, the-objection should have been taken by demurrer. Clay v. Brigham, 8 Gray, 161. Downs v. Hawley, 112 Mass. 237, 241.

The exceptions are frivolous, and are overruled with double costs, and interest at twelve per cent.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lathrop, J.

If the declarations in these cases are to be construed, as the defendants contend, as each containing only one count, which embraces two causes of action, and so are in violation of the Pub. Sts. c. 167, § 2, cl. 4, the-objection should have been taken by demurrer. Clay v. Brigham, 8 Gray, 161. Downs v. Hawley, 112 Mass. 237, 241.

The exceptions are frivolous, and are overruled with double costs, and interest at twelve per cent.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 N.E. 196, 182 Mass. 572, 1903 Mass. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shattuck-v-marcus-mass-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack