Shattuck v. Chamberlin
4 Cow. 14
Opinion
The offer to pay costs was insufficient, as being made to the defendant’s counsel. It should have been to the attorney. He, alone, is in general able to know the amount of the costs, and authorized to receive them. The motion must be. granted, ¡unless the plaintiff stipulate.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shattuck v. Chamberlin, 4 Cow. 14 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
4 Cow. 14 (Shattuck v. Chamberlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Jose Alfredo Carrillo-Espinoza
24 F.3d 250 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)