Shattuck v. Chamberlin
4 Cow. 14
This text of 4 Cow. 14 (Shattuck v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shattuck v. Chamberlin, 4 Cow. 14 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
Opinion
The offer to pay costs was insufficient, as being made to the defendant’s counsel. It should have been to the attorney. He, alone, is in general able to know the amount of the costs, and authorized to receive them. The motion must be. granted, ¡unless the plaintiff stipulate.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Jose Alfredo Carrillo-Espinoza
24 F.3d 250 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cow. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shattuck-v-chamberlin-nysupct-1825.