Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank
83 P. 1116, 73 Kan. 793, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 340
This text of 83 P. 1116 (Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank, 83 P. 1116, 73 Kan. 793, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 340 (kan 1906).
Opinion
On the authority of Kelso v. Norton, 65 Kan. 778, 70 Pac. 896, 93 Am. St. Rep. 308, and Henthorn v. Security Co., 70 Kan. 808, 79 Pac. 653, this case is affirmed. Under the uncontroverted facts, the only legal right, if any, the plaintiff has in the land in question is to redeem and have an accounting for rents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kelso v. Norton
70 P. 896 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1902)
Henthorn v. Security Co.
79 P. 653 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
83 P. 1116, 73 Kan. 793, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shattuck-v-belknap-savings-bank-kan-1906.