Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.

634 So. 2d 901, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 4053, 1993 WL 592000
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 La. App. LEXIS 4052
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 29, 1993·No. No. CW 93 1410·Published

Opinion

EDWARDS, Judge.

The defendants, International Grain Transfer, Inc. and LIGA, applied for supervisory writs from the denial of a Motion for Summary Judgment. On September 16, 1993, we granted a writ of certiorari (see 93 CW 1410) to set the matter for hearing together with its companion ease, Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc., 92 CA 1690, 634 So.2d 897. The decision reached in 92 CA 1690, handed down this date addresses and moots the issue raised in this writ application, of whether the trial court erred in denying the motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed as moot.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc., 634 So. 2d 901, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 4053, 1993 WL 592000 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

634 So. 2d 901 (Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.
634 So. 2d 897 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)