Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.

471 So. 2d 725, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10470

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 21, 1984

DocketNo. CA 84 0687

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 471 So. 2d 725 (Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc., 471 So. 2d 725, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10470 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

GROVER L. COVINGTON, Judge.

The issue before the court is whether this appeal should be dismissed as frivolous, and whether appellee is entitled to damages for a frivolous appeal.

This matter was previously before this court and was remanded for a determination of whether the appellee was totally or permanently disabled. Shatoska v. International Grain Transfer, Inc., 430 So.2d 1255 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983). The instant appeal was taken from the trial court’s determination that the appellee was totally disabled.

Appellee filed an answer to the appeal on June 7, 1984, in which he asked for damages for the alleged frivolous appeal; on the next day, he filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as being frivolous.

The remedy for a frivolous appeal is not dismissal, but affirmance of the judgment when the appeal is heard and found to be without merit. Macedonia Baptist Foundation v. Singleton, 379 So.2d 267 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979). Adequate sanctions against the taking of a frivolous appeal are provided by law. See La.C.C.P. art. 2164.

MOTION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI