Sharrow v. Cool

3 N.J.L. 406
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1808·Published

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

—I think the judgment must be reversed. The state of demand contains no cause of action; whatever right the plaintiff may have, he lias exhibited none in this statement.

The other Judges concurred.

Judgment reversed-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharrow v. Cool, 3 N.J.L. 406 (N.J. 1808).

3 N.J.L. 406 (Sharrow v. Cool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.