Sharrod Latez Johnson v. Morriean Kamokia Bell
This text of Sharrod Latez Johnson v. Morriean Kamokia Bell (Sharrod Latez Johnson v. Morriean Kamokia Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00327-CV ___________________________
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MORRIEAN KAMOKIA BELL AND SHARROD LATEZ JOHNSON
On Appeal from the 231st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 231-755653-24
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On August 29, 2025, we notified Appellant Sharrod Latez Johnson that the
trial-court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us
that Appellant has not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules
require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, Appellant arranged
to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because Appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,
we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: October 9, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharrod Latez Johnson v. Morriean Kamokia Bell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharrod-latez-johnson-v-morriean-kamokia-bell-texapp-2025.