Sharri Kaye Evenson v. State
This text of Sharri Kaye Evenson v. State (Sharri Kaye Evenson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 17, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01124-CR
SHARRI KAYE EVENSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004-87496-2011
ORDER Official Court Reporter Claudia Webb’s January 10, 2013 request for an additional
extension of time to file the reporter’s record is DENIED.
Because no reporter’s record has been filed within the time allowed, the trial court is
ORDERED to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the
reporter’s record because of ineffective assistance of counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.
The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If
the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a
finding to that effect.
If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next
determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall
make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to
take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include
appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine
whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.
The trial court shall next determine: (1) whether appellant requested preparation of the
reporter’s record; (2) the date such request was made; and (3) whether appellant, if not indigent,
paid or made arrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.
35.3, 37.3.
The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who
recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) whether the notes from any hearings are available; (3)
if available, whether the notes can be transcribed; (4) the name and address of the court reporter
who will transcribe the notes; (5) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the
reporter’s record; and (6) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court a supplemental clerk’s record,
containing the written findings of fact, any recommendations, any supporting documentation,
and any orders within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated thirty (30) days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sharri Kaye Evenson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharri-kaye-evenson-v-state-texapp-2013.