Sharpless v. Sevier and Harrison

1 Tenn. 117
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedMarch 6, 1805
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 117 (Sharpless v. Sevier and Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharpless v. Sevier and Harrison, 1 Tenn. 117 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1805).

Opinion

The cause stands upon the same footing as if it were an application at the first term after issue joined. The cause has been continued by consent, either expressed or implied for a general continuance, amounts to implied consent. Therefore, the defendants have no cause to complain of the length of time this cause has been depending, supposing this the first application for a continuance, according to our practice it would be granted and consequently the nonsuit ought to be set aside. The cause was continued at the last terms, as it had uniform *119 ly been before ; since which, the affidavit shews that exertions have been used to procure certain papers : that they were procured at so late a period, as scarcely to afford time to make the necessary preparation, at least it seems reasonable to think so.

The affidavit also states the papers to be material. It is the duty of all judicial tribunals to make an end of disputes by a fair trial, if it can be done consistently with the rules of the court—no trial in this case has been had, therefore let the non suit be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharpless-v-sevier-and-harrison-tennsuperct-1805.