Sharpless Bros. v. Gummey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Sharpless Bros. v. Gummey

30 A. 1127, 166 Pa. 199, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1175

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 21, 1895

DocketAppeal No. 455

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A. 1127 (Sharpless Bros. v. Gummey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharpless Bros. v. Gummey, 30 A. 1127, 166 Pa. 199, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1175 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We have considered the testimony, of which the compulsory nonsuit in this case is predicated, and are satisfied that the learned trial judge rightly held it was insufficient to justify [202]*202submission of the case to the jury. There is no such evidence of fraud as would warrant any trial court in sustaining a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. That, being so, there was no error in entering the judgment of nonsuit, and afterwards refusing to take it off.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We have considered the testimony, of which the compulsory nonsuit in this case is predicated, and are satisfied that the learned trial judge rightly held it was insufficient to justify [202]*202submission of the case to the jury. There is no such evidence of fraud as would warrant any trial court in sustaining a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. That, being so, there was no error in entering the judgment of nonsuit, and afterwards refusing to take it off.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A. 1127, 166 Pa. 199, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharpless-bros-v-gummey-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack