Sharpe v. Tri-Color, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Sharpe v. Tri-Color, Inc.

185 So. 2d 169, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3626

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1966

DocketNo. 34745

StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 2d 169 (Sharpe v. Tri-Color, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharpe v. Tri-Color, Inc., 185 So. 2d 169, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3626 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 9, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

[170]*170The petition for attorney’s fee is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI