Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Sharpe v. State

Sharpe v. State

190 S.E.2d 90, 126 Ga. App. 87, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1057
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1972
Docket47085
StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.E.2d 90 (Sharpe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sharpe v. State, 190 S.E.2d 90, 126 Ga. App. 87, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1057 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for burglary and the denial of his motion for a new trial.

1. The evidence supports the verdict.

2. Defendant’s confession was properly admitted into evidence. The court held a hearing to determine voluntariness in accordance with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368 (84 SC 1774, 12 LE2d 908, 1 ALR3d 1205). While conflicting, there was sufficient evidence to support the court’s finding. Brawner v. Smith, 225 Ga. 296 (167 SE2d 753); Furman v. State, 225 Ga. 253 (167 SE2d 628).

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Denno
378 U.S. 368 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Brawner v. Smith
167 S.E.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Furman v. State
167 S.E.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.E.2d 90, 126 Ga. App. 87, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharpe-v-state-gactapp-1972.