Sharpe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sharpe v. State

128 S.E. 784, 34 Ga. App. 148, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 92

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1925

Docket16412

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 784 (Sharpe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharpe v. State, 128 S.E. 784, 34 Ga. App. 148, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Sharpe was convicted of the offense of seduction. He com-

plains: (a) that the verdict was not authorized by the evidence, and (6) that the venue was not proved. The evidence authorized the conviction, and the conviction has the approval of the trial judge. There was evidence that the crime was committed in the county alleged in [149]*149the indictment and in which the defendant was being tried. Eor no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided June 9, 1925. Enoch J. Giles, for plaintiff , in error. Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, Saffold & Stallings, Lankford & Rogers, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Blood/worth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI