Sharpe v. State

243 So. 3d 525
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2018·No. No. 1D17–5330·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*526AFFIRMED . See Martinez v. State , 211 So.3d 989, 992 (Fla. 2017) (holding that alleged defect in information, which purportedly deprived defendant of his due process right to notice of potential enhanced sentence, did not result in an "illegal sentence" subject to correction under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) ).

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharpe v. State, 243 So. 3d 525 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

243 So. 3d 525 (Sharpe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jose Martinez v. State of Florida
211 So. 3d 989 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)