Sharpe v. State
88 So. 3d 363, 2012 WL 1605446, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7332
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2012·No. No. 4D11-1379·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals the revocation of his probation pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and sentence, but we remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation that specifies the conditions appellant was found to have violated. A.T.J.F. v. State, 78 So.3d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Ruiz v. State, 78 So.3d 57, 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
Affirmed; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sharpe v. State, 88 So. 3d 363, 2012 WL 1605446, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7332 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
88 So. 3d 363 (Sharpe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edward J. Hoover v. State
150 So. 3d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Hoover v. State
150 So. 3d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)