Sharpe v. State

825 So. 2d 519, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13192, 2002 WL 31026603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sharpe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 861 So. 2d 483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 2002·No. No. 1D00-3289·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As appellant admits, the trial court correctly scored his prior conviction for aggravated fleeing as a Level 5 offense on the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet. We find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal or motion for new trial. See Jordan v. State, 548 So.2d 737 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We do find imposition of the three-year mandatory minimum to be in error, as the State concedes, because the statutory authority under which it was imposed did not become effective until July 1, 1999. See § 893.186(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). That portion of the sentence must be vacated, and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED in part and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharpe v. State, 825 So. 2d 519, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13192, 2002 WL 31026603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

825 So. 2d 519 (Sharpe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan v. State
548 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)