Sharpe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sharpe v. State

686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 1996 WL 366302

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 1996

DocketNo. 95-01325

StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 19 (Sharpe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharpe v. State, 686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 1996 WL 366302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

THREADGILL, Chief Judge.

Lee Sharpe, Jr., appeals a judgment and sentence entered upon revocation of his probation. The record supports a finding that Mr. Sharpe committed a willful and substantial violation of his probation. We therefore affirm the order revoking probation and the judgment and sentence. We remand, however, for the order of probation to be conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement requiring Mr. Sharpe to pay $75.00 per month toward restitution.

Affirmed; remanded.

RYDER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THREADGILL, Chief Judge.

Lee Sharpe, Jr., appeals a judgment and sentence entered upon revocation of his probation. The record supports a finding that Mr. Sharpe committed a willful and substantial violation of his probation. We therefore affirm the order revoking probation and the judgment and sentence. We remand, however, for the order of probation to be conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement requiring Mr. Sharpe to pay $75.00 per month toward restitution.

Affirmed; remanded.

RYDER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6873, 1996 WL 366302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharpe-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.