Sharp v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Sharp v. United States

55 F.2d 227, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3749

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 1932·No. No. 3243·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record convinces us that the judgment below should be affirmed, and that the points raised do not justify any extended discussion. There was ample evidence that'appellant was guilty of the crime charged. The judge below was within his discretion in hearing evidence as to the prior conduct of appellant, in deciding what punishment to impose upon her. And the punishment imposed was within the limit fixed by the statute.

There was no error, and the judgment below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record convinces us that the judgment below should be affirmed, and that the points raised do not justify any extended discussion. There was ample evidence that'appellant was guilty of the crime charged. The judge below was within his discretion in hearing evidence as to the prior conduct of appellant, in deciding what punishment to impose upon her. And the punishment imposed was within the limit fixed by the statute.

There was no error, and the judgment below will be affirmed.

Sharp v. United States, 55 F.2d 227, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3749 (4th Cir. 1932).

Pincite

55 F.2d 227 (Sharp v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related