Sharp v. Texas

414 U.S. 1118, 94 S. Ct. 854
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1974·No. No. 73-386·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Appeal from Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973).

Mr. Justice [1119]*1119Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharp v. Texas, 414 U.S. 1118, 94 S. Ct. 854 (1974).

414 U.S. 1118 (Sharp v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crunk v. State
934 S.W.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)