Sharp v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Sharp v. Taylor

99 So. 923, 211 Ala. 701

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 24, 1924

Docket6 Div. 107.

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 923 (Sharp v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharp v. Taylor, 99 So. 923, 211 Ala. 701 (Ala. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAYRE, J..

This is an appeal upon the record proper. There is ho bill of exceptions. Errors are assigned upon the court’s rulings against appellant on demurrers to defendant’s special pleas, the giving of certain charges in writing requested by defendant, and the overruling of plaintiff’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial. On the authority of Moody v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. Co., 209 Ala. 479, 96 South. 427, the judgment must be affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAYRE, J..

This is an appeal upon the record proper. There is ho bill of exceptions. Errors are assigned upon the court’s rulings against appellant on demurrers to defendant’s special pleas, the giving of certain charges in writing requested by defendant, and the overruling of plaintiff’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial. On the authority of Moody v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. Co., 209 Ala. 479, 96 South. 427, the judgment must be affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 923, 211 Ala. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-taylor-ala-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack