Sharp v. State
This text of 94 S.W.2d 177 (Sharp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is driving an automobile on a public street in an incorporated city while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in jail for ninety days.
The record is before us without a statement of facts.
It is appellant’s contention that the penalty provided in Art. 802, P. C., was repealed by chap. 162, Acts 42nd Legislature, Regular Session. In Haworth v. State, 88 S. W. (2d) 115, this court reached the conclusion that said last mentioned act did not have the effect of repealing the penalty set forth in Art. 802, supra.
Our examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that error is not presented.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed,.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.W.2d 177, 130 Tex. Crim. 366, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.