Sharp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sharp v. State

1931 OK CR 46, 296 P. 502, 50 Okla. Crim. 175, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 52

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 24, 1931

DocketNo. A-7752.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 46 (Sharp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharp v. State, 1931 OK CR 46, 296 P. 502, 50 Okla. Crim. 175, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 52 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Hughes county, Okla., of the crime of assault and battery on the person of Roxie Williams, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and costs, and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days, from which judgment the defendant has appealed to this court.

The defendant's appeal was filed in this court on March 7, 1930. No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant, and no reason is shown why a brief has not been filed. No request has been made for oral argument. Where the record shows no brief has been filed for the defendant and no appearance made for oral argument, the court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned.

An examination of the record shows there are no fundamental or prejudicial errors.

The judgment is affirmed. *Page 177

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Hughes county, Okla., of the crime of assault and battery on the person of Roxie Williams, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and costs, and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days, from which judgment the defendant has appealed to this court.

The defendant's appeal was filed in this court on March 7, 1930. No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant, and no reason is shown why a brief has not been filed. No request has been made for oral argument. Where the record shows no brief has been filed for the defendant and no appearance made for oral argument, the court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned.

An examination of the record shows there are no fundamental or prejudicial errors.

The judgment is affirmed. *Page 177

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 46, 296 P. 502, 50 Okla. Crim. 175, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.