Sharp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sharp v. State

1911 OK CR 424, 117 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 638, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 397

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 19, 1911

DocketNo. A-825.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 424 (Sharp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharp v. State, 1911 OK CR 424, 117 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 638, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 397 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Major county on the 13th day of April, 1910, on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor for the unlawful purpose of selling same, and on the 14th day of April, thereafter, was senteeed by the court to pay a fine of three hundred dollars and serve one hundred twenty days in the county jail. An appeal was duly perfected in this court on the 7th day of July, 1910. In January, 1911, plaintiff in error abandoned his appeal and by his counsel filed a motion on the 7th day of said month to dismiss the same. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, and the clerk directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Major county on the 13th day of April, 1910, on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor for the unlawful purpose of selling same, and on the 14th day of April, thereafter, was senteeed by the court to pay a fine of three hundred dollars and serve one hundred twenty days in the county jail. An appeal was duly perfected in this court on the 7th day of July, 1910. In January, 1911, plaintiff in error abandoned his appeal and by his counsel filed a motion on the 7th day of said month to dismiss the same. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, and the clerk directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 424, 117 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 638, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharp-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.