Sharp v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sharp v. Sharp

173 S.E. 655, 178 Ga. 668, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 129

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 13, 1934·No. No. 10121·Published

Opinion

Russell, O. J.

Altogether excluding from consideration testimony in behalf of the wife as to the earnings of the husband, since the husband admitted that he was earning a wage of $4.25 weekly, the court did not err in requiring him to pay temporary alimony of $1.50 per week.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Dan Plaster, L. M. TathcCm,, and PL. A. Glore, for plaintiff. PL. PL. Hamriclc, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, O. J.

Altogether excluding from consideration testimony in behalf of the wife as to the earnings of the husband, since the husband admitted that he was earning a wage of $4.25 weekly, the court did not err in requiring him to pay temporary alimony of $1.50 per week.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Dan Plaster, L. M. TathcCm,, and PL. A. Glore, for plaintiff. PL. PL. Hamriclc, for defendant.

Sharp v. Sharp, 173 S.E. 655, 178 Ga. 668, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 129 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

173 S.E. 655 (Sharp v. Sharp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.